4.6 Article

CAPACITY SHARING STRATEGY WITH SUSTAINABLE REVENUE-SHARING CONTRACTS

期刊

出版社

VILNIUS GEDIMINAS TECH UNIV
DOI: 10.3846/tede.2021.16030

关键词

duopoly; capacity sharing strategy; sustainable revenue-sharing contracts; two-part tariff; win-win development

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [N2123006]
  2. Consulting and Research Project Jilin Branch of Chinese Institute of Engineering Development Strategies in 2020 [JL2020-005-05]
  3. Major project of Philosophy and Social Sciences Key Research Base of Jilin University [2020XXJD13]
  4. Undergraduate Teaching Reform Research Project of Jilin University [2021XZC022]
  5. MOE Project of Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences
  6. Education Department Project of Jilin Province [JJKH20211238 SK]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper develops a duopoly model to analyze the effects of capacity sharing strategy and optimal revenue-sharing contract in different scenarios, showing that capacity constraints affect sustainable development, but capacity sharing may not improve social welfare.
This paper develops a duopoly model to analyse capacity sharing strategy and the optimal revenue-sharing contract under a two-part tariff and examines the effects of capacity sharing, cost, and sharing charges in three scenarios. The paper uses the two-part tariff method and adds a more realistic assumption of incremental marginal costs to improve the research on capacity sharing strategies. The results show that capacity constraints affect the sustainable development of firms. A sustainable revenue-sharing contract can create a win-win situation for both firms and promote capacity sharing. Capacity sharing, cost, and the revenue-sharing rate have different impacts in different scenarios; the optimal revenue-sharing rate and fixed fee can be determined to maximise the profits of firms that share capacity. However, capacity sharing may not improve social welfare.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据