4.3 Article

Explaining resistance intention towards mobile HRM application: the dark side of technology adoption

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANPOWER
卷 43, 期 1, 页码 206-225

出版社

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/IJM-03-2021-0198

关键词

Mobile HRM application; Status quo bias theory; Resistance behaviour; Personal innovativeness

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines factors influencing HR professionals' resistance to mHRM app adoption, finding that regret avoidance, inertia, switching costs, and perceived threat significantly affect resistance. Additionally, personal innovativeness negatively moderates the association between inhibitors and resistance to adopting the mHRM app.
Purpose The mobile human resource management application (mHRM app) has recently been seen as an innovative cloud-based solution to manage human resource management (HRM) within organisation. Despite its great potential, organisations have shown resistance towards the usage of the mHRM app. This study investigates the dark side of electronic HRM (eHRM) by examining factors affecting HR professionals' resistance to the mHRM app using status quo bias (SQB) theory. The study also examines the moderating effect of personal innovativeness. Design/methodology/approach Responses were collected from 239 HR professionals using an online survey. Structural equation modelling (SEM) and PROCESS macro were used to examine the hypotheses. Findings The results indicated that regret avoidance, inertia, switching costs and perceived threat significantly affect HR professionals' resistance towards mHRM app adoption. Results also indicated that high personal innovativeness negatively moderates the association between inhibitors and resistance to adopt the mHRM app. Practical implications The study's findings will help HR professionals reduce their resistance towards mHRM app adoption. Originality/value This study enriches eHRM, mobile applications and the SQB literature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据