4.7 Article

An actor-oriented perspective on innovation systems: Functional analysis of drivers and barriers to innovation and technology adoption in the mining sector

期刊

TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY
卷 68, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101920

关键词

Technological innovation systems; TIS; Mining sector; Drivers and barriers to innovation adoption and diffusion; Firm agency

资金

  1. Queensland Government Department of State Development, Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Planning
  2. Mining3

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the drivers and barriers to technology development, adoption, and diffusion in an innovation system. By analyzing case study data, the research identifies the prevailing factors influencing technology developers in the mining industry and establishes connections to key innovation processes at the firm level. The study also explores strategies employed by firms to overcome barriers and enhance innovation processes.
Technology developers are key actors in an innovation system. Applying the technological innovation systems perspective as an analytical framework, our study unpacks drivers and barriers to technology development, adoption and diffusion in an innovation system and relates these to firm-level innovation processes. We approach this by situating our enquiry at the intersection of system- and firm-level perspectives. Based on case study data, our research highlights drivers and barriers prevailing in the mining innovation system affecting technology developers and establishes links to key innovation processes relevant to these firms. We complement these findings with insights into strategies firms employ to mitigate or overcome barriers identified, with the potential to positively affect innovation processes at the firm level. We argue that enablers and barriers to innovation encountered by firms have their effect by affording or impeding opportunities for firms to undertake the inno-vation processes required to attain technological innovation outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据