4.3 Article

Rules all the way down: Consumer behaviour from the standpoint of the 'ONE behavioural' research programme

期刊

JOURNAL OF CONSUMER BEHAVIOUR
卷 22, 期 3, 页码 531-546

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cb.2035

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article proposes a unified behavioral research program that integrates old, new, and evolutionary behavioral approaches as an alternative to the dominant rational choice theory and Walrasian view in economics. It can also serve as a framework for interdisciplinary research on consumer behavior. The key idea is that evolution in the economy and human systems involves the creation, adoption, and abandonment of rules for addressing infinite regress problems and cognitive challenges. Researchers need to develop knowledge of these rules to anticipate behavior.
This article sets out a unified behavioural research programme that integrates compatible elements of old, new and evolutionary behavioural approaches to economics as an alternative to the dominant unified approach to economics based on rational choice theory and a Walrasian view of market coordination. However, the proposed programme can also be viewed as a general framework for interdisciplinary research on consumer behaviour. It employs the view of scientific research programmes proposed by Lakatos, setting out groups of 'hard-core' propositions and their associated 'do' and 'do not' rules for the conduct of researchers. The unifying theme is that evolution in the economy (and in human systems more generally) entails the creation, adoption and abandonment of rules for dealing effectively with open-ended choice problems that are bedevilled by infinite regress problems and cognitive challenges that people seek to address via personal repertoires of hierarchically related rules. To anticipate behaviour, researchers need to develop knowledge of these rules (including heuristics and routines), their functionality and the processes by which they get changed or prove difficult to change even where they cause problems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据