4.5 Article

The impact of COVID-19 on European tourists' attitudes to air travel and the consequences for tourist destination evoked set formation

期刊

TOURISM MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES
卷 41, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.tmp.2022.100945

关键词

Risk; Anxiety; Evoked set; COVID-19; Big data; Flights; Europe

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the impact of risk conditions resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic on tourists' desire to travel, intention to visit, and the destination choice process. The analysis is based on 5134 million flight searches and 379 million flight picks in 2020 from the 17 largest tourism source markets in Europe. An unweighted index is used to measure the average variation of searches and picks in 2020 compared to the reference base period of 2019. The study also analyzes 17 international travel destinations within the evoked sets of the largest outbound markets in Europe (Germany and UK), and identifies the markets most favorable to Spain. The research design can provide insights for cost-efficient marketing decisions in a situation of high uncertainty.
We study how risk conditions derived from the COVID-19 pandemic may impact on both the desire to travel and intention to visit of tourists and, therefore, on different stages of the destination choice process. We analyse 5134 million flight searches and 379 million flight picks during 2020 for the 17 largest European tourism source markets. An unweighted index number is employed to measure the average variation for searches and picks, for the year 2020, in relation to the reference base period (year 2019). This is done for air travel in general and to Spain specifically. The study then proceeds to conduct an analysis of 17 international travel destinations that are in the evoked sets of the two largest outbound markets in Europe (Germany and UK). We also identify which markets are most favourable to Spain. The research design can inform cost-efficient marketing decisions in a situation of high uncertainty.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据