4.5 Article

Understanding Medical Distrust Among African American/Black and Latino Persons Living With HIV With Sub-Optimal Engagement Along the HIV Care Continuum: A Machine Learning Approach

期刊

SAGE OPEN
卷 11, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/21582440211061314

关键词

medical mistrust; medical distrust; HIV care continuum; machine learning; random forest; racial; ethnic disparities

资金

  1. National Institute on Drug Abuse at the National Institutes of Health [R01DA040480]
  2. Center for Drug Use and HIV Research [P30DA011041]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study identified age and depression as the most important predictors of medical trust among African American/Black and Latino persons living with HIV, highlighting the need for targeted interventions to build trust in healthcare systems and providers for this population.
Medical distrust is a potent barrier to participation in HIV care and medication use among African American/Black and Latino (AABL) persons living with HIV (PLWH). However, little is known about sociodemographic and risk factors associated with distrust. We recruited adult AABL PLWH from low socio-economic status backgrounds with insufficient engagement in HIV care (N = 512). Participants completed structured assessments on three types of distrust (of health care providers, health care systems, and counter-narratives), HIV history, and mental health. We used a type of machine learning called random forest to explore predictors of trust. On average, participants were 47 years old (SD = 11 years), diagnosed with HIV 18 years prior (SD = 9 years), and mainly male (64%) and African American/Black (69%). Depression and age were the most important predictors of trust. Among those with elevated depressive symptoms, younger participants had less trust than older, while among those without depression, trust was greater across all ages. The present study adds nuance to the literature on medical distrust among AABL PLWH and identifies junctures where interventions to build trust are needed most.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据