4.5 Article

Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use in Slovakia: Results of a National Population Survey

期刊

SAGE OPEN
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/21582440211068480

关键词

CAM; Slovakia; nationwide survey; predictors; adult population

资金

  1. project VEGA [1/0333/19, 1/0381/22]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has significantly increased in Europe in recent decades. A nationwide representative survey in Slovakia showed that 82.4% of adults reported either regular or lifetime use of CAM methods. The study also highlighted that factors such as female gender, higher income, and higher education play important roles in predicting CAM use.
The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in Europe has intensely increased in recent decades. To acquire information about the patterns and trends of CAM use in Slovakia, a nationwide representative survey was conducted on Slovakian adult population. A nationally representative cross-sectional survey was administered to the general population of Slovakian residents aged 18 years and over. The respondents were interviewed face-to-face by professional interviewers. Data were collected during September 2019 as a part of an omnibus survey on a variety of subjects. Altogether, 82.4% of the respondents reported either regular CAM method use or the lifetime prevalence of such use. The most frequently reported group of methods were biologically based treatments (78.9%), followed by manipulative and body-based methods (54.4%), mind-body interventions (31.9%), whole medical systems (18.2%), and energy therapies (4.2%). Vitamins (71.1%), herbal teas (68.1%), massages (53.6%), religious healing (20.3%), and special diets (18.8%) were the five most commonly preferred CAM modalities. Female gender, higher income and higher education are significant predictors of CAM use. The study highlights the association between satisfaction with healthcare systems, health situations, and the use of CAM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据