4.1 Article

Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Russian-speaking Immigrants: The Importance of Culture and Home Country Experiences

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMIGRANT AND MINORITY HEALTH
卷 24, 期 5, 页码 1300-1308

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10903-021-01291-8

关键词

Cancer screening; Colonoscopy; Colorectal cancer; Immigrant; Russian; Former Soviet Union

资金

  1. New York State Department of Health [15-0459-03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study identified barriers to timely colorectal cancer screening, especially colonoscopies, among Russian-speaking individuals in New York City. The barriers included individual, communal, and structural issues, as well as distinctive barriers related to culture and experiences under the Soviet system. Interventions suggested by the research, such as more education and more effective provider recommendations, have the potential to reduce these barriers.
There is potential to improve low colorectal cancer screening rates, reduce mortality, and narrow health disparities, if the distinctive screening barriers among Russian-speaking immigrants were better understood. However, there is little relevant research about the topic. To address this gap, this study aimed to identify barriers to timely colorectal cancer screening, especially colonoscopies, among Russian-speakers in New York City. Thirteen key informant interviews were performed with providers, community leaders, and academics. Eight focus groups were then conducted with 81 Russian-speaking individuals, age 50-75, who had not had a timely colonoscopy. Results were translated, transcribed, coded and analyzed. Barriers identified included individual, communal, and structural issues. Distinctive barriers, such as those related to culture and to the experiences of living under the Soviet system, were uncovered. Barriers identified can potentially be reduced through interventions suggested by the research, including more education and more effective provider recommendations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据