4.6 Article

The politics of post-developmentalist expertise: progressive movements, strategic localism, and urban governance in Seoul

期刊

URBAN GEOGRAPHY
卷 43, 期 1, 页码 134-152

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02723638.2021.2003587

关键词

Urban expertise; social movements; postdevelopmentalism; neoliberal localism; community planning; South Korea

资金

  1. Korean Studies Promotion Service of the Academy of Korean Studies [AKS-2018-OLU-2250001]
  2. Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea's Core University Program for Korean Studies
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [AKS-2018-OLU-2250001] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article examines progressive 'post-developmentalist' urban expertise in Seoul, South Korea, highlighting the potential risks these experts face in becoming a policy fix for reconfigured neoliberal and developmentalist agendas while promoting progressive policies through localism.
This article interrogates emergent forms of progressive 'post-developmentalist' urban expertise in Seoul, South Korea. We argue that a critical understanding of the nexus between political and civil society forged by pro-democratic activism is necessary to understand the politics of this expertise and the dilemmas it has encountered in creating alternatives to the legacy of developmentalist urbanization and promoting a more inclusive and emancipatory vision of urban politics. To illustrate our argument, we examine two cases: the first involves the incorporation of progressive labour, intellectual, and civil society activists to create urban-level institutions of social dialogue to upgrade labour relations. The second explores a community-empowerment movement, called Maulmandeulgi, initiated by local activists and later institutionalized in Seoul and other cities to establish a participatory model of community building. These cases detail how these actors have promoted progressive policies through engaging in strategic forms of localism, but also how their activity has risked becoming a policy fix for reconfigured neoliberal and developmentalist policy agendas. This risk is most apparent, we argue, as the political context at the national level has shifted between conservative and liberal administrations and the knowledge practices developed by these experts encouraged to move between places and across scale.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据