4.2 Article

Examining the cost and impact of dosing fees among clients in opioid agonist treatment: Results from a cross-sectional survey of Australian treatment clients

期刊

DRUG AND ALCOHOL REVIEW
卷 41, 期 4, 页码 841-850

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/dar.13437

关键词

opioid use disorder; opiate substitution treatment; opioid medication-assisted treatment; buprenorphine; methadone

资金

  1. UNSW
  2. Indivior
  3. National Health and Medical Research Council research fellowships [1135991, 1163961]
  4. National Institutes of Health [NIDA R01DA1104470]
  5. Australian Government Department of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study explores the financial and social impact of dosing fees on Opioid agonist treatment (OAT) clients. The findings reveal that these fees have negative consequences on treatment access and retention, affecting clients' physical health, mental health, and social wellbeing.
Introduction Opioid agonist treatment (OAT) clients frequently bear costs associated with their treatment, including dosing fees. This study aimed to explore the financial and social impact of dosing fees upon clients. Methods Cross-sectional survey of people who use opioids regularly (N = 402) between December 2017 and March 2018, conducted in Australia. Dosing fees were calculated and expressed as percentage of income, by OAT type. Consequences and strategies for difficulties making payments were examined as proportions. Results A total of N = 360 participants had ever been in OAT and N = 245 participants currently engaged in OAT reported data on dosing fees, of them 53% (n = 129) reported paying dosing fees. Compared to clients with high levels of dosing supervision, those with moderate or low levels of supervision were more likely to pay dosing fees. The median 28-day dosing fee was AUD$110 (interquartile range AUD$80); median 28-day income was AUD$1520 (interquartile range AUD$700). For those who paid dosing fees, the fee comprised <10% of total monthly income for 70% of participants; however, 23% of participants paid fees comprising 10% to <20%, and 7% of participants paid fees comprising 20% or more of monthly income. Among those that had ever been in OAT, 72% experienced difficulties in paying treatment costs; 36% left treatment earlier than intended and 25% had been excluded due to payment difficulties. Discussion and Conclusions Negative consequences of treatment costs to clients, particularly dosing fees, are evident. These costs impact treatment access and retention that may negatively impact clients' physical health, mental health and social wellbeing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据