4.5 Article

Effect of customer's perception on service robot acceptance

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSUMER STUDIES
卷 46, 期 4, 页码 1241-1261

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ijcs.12755

关键词

ability; anthropomorphism; autonomy; customer acceptance; role clarity; service encounter; service robot; technology acceptance model

类别

资金

  1. Center for Japanese Studies of Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications [K2020-215]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the factors influencing customer acceptance of service robots, finding that anthropomorphism, autonomy, and ability are positively related to perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. The study establishes a conceptual model that suggests customer attitude determines the acceptance of service robots in service encounters.
A service robot is a physical entity integrated with information technology (IT) which can autonomously provide customized services to people. While the use of robots is regarded as one of the most important trends in service marketing, customer acceptance is still a major barrier to their application in service scenarios. This study examines robot characteristics (anthropomorphism, autonomy) and customer characteristics (role clarity, ability) as antecedents affecting customer acceptance of service robots from the perspective of service encounters. Subsequently, the study develops a conceptual model based on the technology acceptance model (TAM). A sample of 406 respondents from an online survey in China was used to test the proposed conceptual model. The results show that anthropomorphism, autonomy, and ability are positively related to perceived usefulness, while autonomy, ability, and role clarity are positively related to perceived ease of use. Both perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use are significant antecedents of customer attitude. Customer attitude determines customer acceptance of service robots in service encounters. Our findings have implications for both researchers and practitioners.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据