4.2 Article

Augmented reality for virtual training in the construction industry

出版社

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-205049

关键词

Business training; augmented reality; TAM; technology acceptance

资金

  1. Unidad de Mejoramiento Docente and Research Department of the University of La Serena [PR18362]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study used the Technology Acceptance Model to investigate the intention to use augmented reality in construction training, focusing on preventing injuries and disabilities. The results showed that perceived usefulness and ease of use have an impact on attitude and intention to use. These findings have significant implications for practical applications in the construction industry.
BACKGROUND: Technology has evolved in surprising ways, and augmented reality (AR) has positioned itself as one of the technologies with outstanding value. Its importance in education is still being debated, but its incorporation in business training has been left out. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine variables that explain the intention to use this technology in construction training, focused on preventing injuries and disabilities. METHODS: This study was carried out using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) through the structural equation method. The variables: perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, attitude toward using, and behavioral intention to use were incorporated. An AR app was developed that addresses the teaching of safety elements on scaffolding, and we collected data from Chilean construction companies. RESULTS: The results show that perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use explain the attitude towards using augmented reality, while perceived usefulness and attitude towards using explain behavioral intention to use. CONCLUSIONS: These findings enrich AR's literature in the construction industry and have high business managers' implications. It may allow them to implement this technology more likely to succeed in their virtual business training to prevent injury-related disability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据