4.3 Article

CHILI - the Chicago Instrument for Laser Ionization - a new tool for isotope measurements in cosmochemistry

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijms.2016.06.001

关键词

Resonance ionization mass spectrometry; Cosmochemistry; Isotopes; Isobaric interference

资金

  1. NASA Sample Return Laboratory Instruments and Data Analysis Program
  2. Laboratory Analysis of Returned Samples Program [NNX07AL94G, NNX11AC21G, NNX15AF78G]
  3. University of Chicago
  4. Argonne National Laboratory
  5. NASA Headquarters under NASA Earth and Space Science Fellowship Program [NNX12AL85H]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We describe CHILI, the Chicago Instrument for Laser Ionization, a new resonance ionization mass spectrometer developed for isotopic analysis at high spatial resolution and high sensitivity of small samples like contemporary interstellar dust grains returned by the Stardust spacecraft. We explain how CHILI addresses the technical challenges associated with such analyses by pushing most technical specifications towards their physical limits. As an initial demonstration, after many years of designing and developing CHILI, we have analyzed presolar silicon carbide grains for their isotopic compositions of strontium, zirconium, and barium. Subsequently, after further technical improvements, we have used CHILI to analyze, for the first time without interference, all stable isotopes of iron and nickel simultaneously in presolar silicon carbide grains. With a special timing scheme for the ionization lasers, we separated iron and nickel isotopes in the time-of-flight spectrum such that the isobaric interference between Fe-58 and Ni-58 was resolved. In-depth discussion of the astrophysical implications of the presolar grain results is deferred to dedicated later publications. Here we focus on the technical aspects of CHILI, its status quo, and further developments necessary to achieve CHILI's ultimate goals, similar to 10 nm lateral resolution and 30-40% useful yield. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据