4.3 Article

Understanding Zoom fatigue: A mixed-method approach

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/apps.12360

关键词

COVID-19; employee well-being; exhaustion; meeting characteristics; video conferences; Zoom fatigue

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Video conference meetings during the COVID-19 pandemic may lead to exhaustion, known as Zoom fatigue. However, objective characteristics do not moderate this relationship. Employees' subjective experiences during video conferences, such as feelings of loss and comparison with pre-pandemic times, contribute to Zoom fatigue.
Video conference meetings, which became frequent during the COVID-19 pandemic, might result in exhaustion (so-called Zoom fatigue). However, only little is known about Zoom fatigue, the objective characteristics shaping it, and the subjective experiences eliciting this phenomenon. Gaining this knowledge is critical for understanding work life during the pandemic. Study 1, a within-person quantitative investigation, tested whether video conferences are exhausting and if objective characteristics (i.e. meeting size, meeting duration, and the presence of the supervisor) moderate Zoom fatigue. Employees from Germany and Israel (N = 81) participated in a 2-week study, with meetings nested within persons (n = 988). Results showed that video conferences are exhausting-more than meetings held through other media. However, objective characteristics did not moderate this relationship. In Study 2, qualitative data from Germany and Israel (N = 53) revealed employees' subjective experiences in video conferences that may lead to Zoom fatigue. These include, for example, experiences of loss and comparison with the good old times before the pandemic. Employees suggested ways to mitigate Zoom fatigue, particularly, better management of meetings by leaders. Our results provide empirical support for Zoom fatigue and suggest which subjective experiences elicit this phenomenon, opening directions for research and practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据