4.2 Article

Conditions for networked co-production through digital participatory platforms in urban planning

期刊

EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES
卷 30, 期 4, 页码 769-788

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2021.1998387

关键词

Co-production; digital participatory platforms; urban planning; public participation; online participation

资金

  1. Joint Programming Initiative (JPI) Urban Europe [854814]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Contemporary urban development is characterized by collaboration between experts and the public, with digital participatory platforms playing a key role. Organizational conditions are crucial for successful adoption and implementation of networked co-production, with a holistic approach emphasizing extensive experimentation and learning by doing.
Contemporary urban development is increasingly characterized by collaboration and co-production between 'experts' and the 'public' in urban planning processes. Recently, local planning actors have adopted digital participatory platforms (DPPs) which are specifically built for networked engagement and collaboration purposes. However, the knowledge on embedding DPPs in wider planning dialogues is still limited and scattered. The aim of this paper is to provide a better understanding of the organizational conditions for the successful adoption and implementation of such networked co-production. Through a set of semi-structured interviews with representatives from public agencies and platform companies, we have analysed how organizational conditions for networked co-production manifest themselves in seven cases of DPP implementation. The analysis shows that these conditions are co-constitutive and co-evolutive rather than concurrent or sequential, with strong links between the compatibility of public agencies, attitudes to co-production, organizational cultures and incentives for co-production. The results critically emphasize the need to adopt holistic approaches to networked co-production, allowing for extensive experimentation and 'learning by doing'.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据