4.2 Article

Why doesn't integrated care work? Using Strong Structuration Theory to explain the limitations of an English case

期刊

SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS
卷 44, 期 1, 页码 113-129

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.13398

关键词

ageing; case study; chronic conditions; ethnography; hospital admissions avoidance; integrated care; Strong Structuration Theory

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust
  2. NIHR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Integrated care aims to organize health and care services for older people and those with chronic conditions. However, empirical evaluations have shown disappointing results, indicating that integrated care programs have not achieved their intended outcomes.
Integrated care is an aim and a method for organising health and care services, particularly for older people and those with chronic conditions. Policy expects that integrated care programmes will provide person-centred coordinated care which will improve patient or client experience, enable population health, prevent hospital admissions and thereby reduce costs. However, empirical evaluations of integrated care interventions have shown disappointing results. We analysed an in-depth case study using Strong Structuration Theory to ask: how and why have efforts to integrate health and social care failed to produce desired outcomes? In our case, integrated case management and the creation of cost-saving plans were dominant practices. People working in health and social care recursively produced a structure of integrated care: a recognised set of resources created by collective activities. Integrated care, intended to help patients manage their long-term conditions and avoid hospital admission, was only a small part of the complex network that sustained patients at home. The structures of integrated care were unable to compensate for changes in patients' health. The result was that patients' experiences remained largely unaffected and hospital admissions were not easily avoided.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据