4.7 Review

Triggers for and barriers to the adoption of environmental management practices by small and medium-sized enterprises: A critical review

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/csr.2244

关键词

contingency theory; environmental management; isomorphism; resource-based view; SMEs; sustainable development

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite numerous studies in the area, the current literature lacks a comprehensive understanding of the drivers and inhibitors of environmental management practices (EMPs) in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). This study conducts a systematic literature review based on three theories, employing descriptive and thematic content analysis to identify triggers and barriers to EMP adoption by SMEs. The analysis reveals that coercive pressures and internal resource capabilities are significant triggers, while internal organizational barriers, such as lack of resources, act as main inhibitors. Both descriptive and thematic content analysis suggest future research directions in this area.
The current literature lacks an integrated and holistic understanding of what drives and inhibits the environmental management practices (EMPs) of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), despite the large number of studies carried out in the area. In order to offer a nuanced understanding of the existing inventory of reported works on SMEs, this study provides a systematic literature review. Based on three theories (i.e., institutional isomorphism, the resource-based view and contingency), the study uses descriptive and thematic content analytical tools to find triggers for (i.e., external and internal) and barriers to the adoption of EMPs by SMEs. The analysis shows that both coercive pressures (especially legislation and customers' demands) and internal resource capabilities serve as significant triggers for the adoption of EMPs by SMEs. This study also finds internal organisational barriers, including lack of resources, acting as the main barriers. Both descriptive and thematic content analysis suggests several avenues for future research in this area.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据