4.3 Review

Predictors of lapse and relapse in physical activity and dietary behaviour: a systematic search and review on prospective studies

期刊

PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH
卷 38, 期 5, 页码 623-646

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2021.1981900

关键词

Review; lapse; relapse; physical activity; dietary behaviour

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Maintaining behavior change is difficult for many people and understanding the determinants of relapse is crucial. Self-efficacy is the only consistent predictor for physical activity lapse and relapse, and dietary behavior relapse.
Objective Behaviour change maintenance seems to be difficult for many people. To prevent people from relapsing, insight into determinants of relapse is needed. We synthesized the evidence on predictors of lapse and relapse in physical activity and dietary behaviour change. Design Prospective studies in adults aged >= 18 years were identified from systematic searches in PsycINFO, PubMed and Cinahl. Methodological quality was analysed, and data were synthesized narratively. Main outcome measures Lapse and relapse in physical activity and dietary behaviour. Results 37 articles were included. For several predictors, evidence for an association was found, with self-efficacy as the only consistent predictor across the different outcomes, predicting both lapse and relapse in physical activity, and relapse in dietary behaviour. For most other variables, evidence for prospective relationships with lapse and relapse was insufficient. Conclusion Most predictors on lapse and relapse were not examined frequently enough to draw conclusions from; many predictors were studied only once or had inconclusive evidence. To be able to provide more substantiated conclusions, more high-quality research is needed. Practitioners and intervention programs could focus on sustainability of behaviour change, by targeting the outcome of interest and its relevant predictors by using behaviour change techniques that have proven effective.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据