4.3 Article

Standing up for Democracy? Explaining Citizens' Support for Democratic Checks and Balances

相关参考文献

注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。
Article Political Science

Candidate evaluations across the aisle: Cross-cultural evidence that out-partisans value candidate warmth more than in-partisans

Alexander Bor et al.

Summary: Research shows that voters tend to pay more attention to the warmth of out-party candidates than to in-party candidates, revealing the complexity of psychological mechanisms regulating candidate warmth. Candidates seeking to reduce the partisan gap should focus on establishing a warm image.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL RESEARCH (2022)

Article Political Science

Partisan Context and Procedural Values: Attitudes Towards Presidential Secrecy Before and after the 2016 US Election

Daniel Berliner

Summary: This study reveals that attitudes towards procedural rules that constrain executive power are influenced by those in power and the political context. Supporters of those in power prefer fewer constraints, while opposition supporters prefer greater ones. Additionally, the study finds a partisan shift in attitudes following elections.

BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE (2022)

Article Political Science

How challenger parties can win big with frozen cleavages: Explaining the landslide victory of the Servant of the People party in the 2019 Ukrainian parliamentary elections

Paul Chaisty et al.

Summary: In the Ukrainian parliamentary elections, the success of Zelensky's Servant of the People party can be attributed to weak and discredited existing parties rather than ideological shifts. This challenges the notion that challenger parties in other contexts must compete on new issue dimensions to succeed electorally.

PARTY POLITICS (2022)

Article Political Science

Permissive Winners? The Quality of Democracy and the Winner-Loser Gap in the Perception of Freedoms

Alejandro Monsivais-Carrillo

Summary: This research provides evidence from survey data in 18 Latin American countries that winners and losers respond differently to the quality of democracy. Winners express more favorable assessments of the supply of freedoms, while losers are more willing to acknowledge improvements or declines in the quality of democracy. The potential consequences of the winner-loser gap for regime stability are highly dependent on the democratic attributes of the political context.

POLITICAL STUDIES (2022)

Article Political Science

Who will defend democracy? Evaluating tradeoffs in candidate support among partisan donors and voters

John Carey et al.

Summary: Scholars and pundits are concerned about the decline in the American public's commitment to democracy, but research shows that both citizens and donors in the US are willing to punish candidates who endorse violations of democratic principles, regardless of party affiliation. However, there are different reactions among partisans when it comes to voter identification laws.

JOURNAL OF ELECTIONS PUBLIC OPINION AND PARTIES (2022)

Article Political Science

When Should the Majority Rule? Experimental Evidence for Madisonian Judgments in Five Cultures

Alexander Bor et al.

Summary: Preferences for majority-rule voting vary across different countries, but when a vulnerable minority is present, participants in all countries tend to prefer consensus decision-making over voting.

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL POLITICAL SCIENCE (2021)

Article Political Science

When You Win, Nothing Hurts: The Durability of Electoral Salience on Individuals' Satisfaction with Democracy

Matthew Loveless

Summary: Research shows that elections have a lasting impact on the satisfaction levels of voters from winning and losing parties, lasting approximately 5 years. Winners of democratic elections tend to be more satisfied and this difference doesn't attenuate quickly.

POLITICAL STUDIES (2021)

Article Political Science

Carving Out: Isolating the True Effect of Self-Interest on Policy Attitudes

Jake Haselswerdt

AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW (2020)

Article Political Science

Fairness matters when responding to disasters: An experimental study of government legitimacy

Honorata Mazepus et al.

GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLICY ADMINISTRATION AND INSTITUTIONS (2020)

Article Political Science

Does Public Support Help Democracy Survive?

Christopher Claassen

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE (2020)

Article Political Science

Constraining Governments: New Indices of Vertical, Horizontal, and Diagonal Accountability

Anna Luhrmann et al.

AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW (2020)

Article Political Science

Democracy in America? Partisanship, Polarization, and the Robustness of Support for Democracy in the United States

Matthew H. Graham et al.

AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW (2020)

Article Political Science

When Polarization Trumps Civic Virtue: Partisan Conflict and the Subversion of Democracy by Incumbents

Milan W. Svolik

QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE (2020)

Article Political Science

Losers lose more than winners win: Asymmetrical effects of winning and losing in elections

Sune Welling Hansen et al.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL RESEARCH (2019)

Article Political Science

Democratic Decline in the United States: What Can We Learn from Middle-Income Backsliding?

Robert R. Kaufman et al.

PERSPECTIVES ON POLITICS (2019)

Article Psychology, Multidisciplinary

Tribalism Is Human Nature

Cory J. Clark et al.

CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2019)

Article Economics

How do voters perceive changes to the rules of the game? Evidence from the 2014 Hungarian elections

John S. Ahlquist et al.

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE ECONOMICS (2018)

Article Political Science

Election outcomes, legislative representation, and satisfaction with democracy

Andre Blais et al.

PARTY POLITICS (2017)

Article Public Administration

A comparative study of legitimation strategies in hybrid regimes

Honorata Mazepus et al.

POLICY STUDIES (2016)

Article Area Studies

The Ukrainian Party System before and after the 2013-2014 Euromaidan

Kostyantyn Fedorenko et al.

EUROPE-ASIA STUDIES (2016)

Article Biology

Equity or equality? Moral judgments follow the money

Peter DeScioli et al.

PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES (2014)

Article Political Science

Not all election winners are equal: Satisfaction with democracy and the nature of the vote

Shane P. Singh

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL RESEARCH (2014)

Article Economics

Why Do Voters Dismantle Checks and Balances?

Daron Acemoglu et al.

REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES (2013)

Article Political Science

Learning to Love Democracy: Electoral Accountability and the Success of Democracy

Milan W. Svolik

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE (2013)

Article Political Science

Differentiating winners: How elections affect satisfaction with democracy

Shane Singh et al.

ELECTORAL STUDIES (2012)

Article Political Science

Critical Citizens and Submissive Subjects: Election Losers and Winners in Africa

Devra C. Moehler

BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE (2009)

Article Political Science

Economic inequality and democratic political engagement

Frederick Solt

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE (2008)

Article Political Science

Democrats with adjectives: Linking direct and indirect measures of democratic support

Andreas Schedler et al.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL RESEARCH (2007)

Article Psychology, Multidisciplinary

Social justice: Outcome and procedure

TR Tyler

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY (2000)