4.5 Review

Global value chains and the environmental sustainability of emerging market firms: A systematic review of literature and research agenda

期刊

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW
卷 30, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2021.101857

关键词

Global value chains; Emerging market firms; Environmental sustainability; Systematic review

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The globalization of production has provided growth and connectivity opportunities for firms and workers in emerging markets. However, research on the relationship between global value chains (GVCs) and environmental sustainability of emerging market firms is lacking coherence. The review highlights the important role of GVCs and emerging market firms' strategies in enabling the implementation of environmental practices and supporting environmental sustainability.
The globalization of production has brought significant growth and connectivity opportunities to firms and workers in emerging markets. However, research on the interplay between global value chains (GVCs) and emerging market firms' environmental sustainability remains fragmented. A coherent picture of the dispersed body of knowledge on the environmental implications of global production vis-`a-vis emerging market firms is lacking. This paper integrates research on GVCs and emerging market firms' environmental sustainability through a systematic literature review. Findings reveal important descriptive and thematic characteristics of the current body of knowledge. They point to the increasingly important yet dual and multilayered role of GVCs in environmental sustainability of emerging market firms. They also highlight the importance of emerging market firms' strategies, capabilities, and collaborative GVC relationships to enable the effective implementation of environmental practices in emerging markets and support the environmental sustainability of GVCs. The review highlights a lack of theorization in analyzing this topic and develops an appropriate research agenda.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据