4.4 Article

The Dynamics of Sources of Knowledge on the Nature of Innovation in the Public Sector: Understanding Incremental and Transformative Innovations in Local Governments

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jopart/muab053

关键词

-

资金

  1. Belmont Forum and JPI Urban Europe (IFWEN Project)
  2. Foundation for the Promotion of Research in the State of Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [2017/50425-9, 2020/07/136-9, 2017/00351-9]
  3. Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) [88881.310380/2018-01]
  4. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [442472/2020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the effects of different sources of knowledge acquisition in public organizations and finds that diversifying external collaborations can enhance transformative innovation, while changing administrative routines can support incremental innovation.
Understanding the effects of different sources of knowledge acquisition in public organizations has become widely promoted for overcoming sociotechnical challenges through innovation. This study divided the sources of knowledge into external and internal learning mechanisms to assess their divergent effects on incremental and transformative innovations in 82 local governments involved in green and blue infrastructure projects. First, the study tests whether more diverse external sources of knowledge acquisition are more effective in increasing transformative innovation than internal learning mechanisms. The second proposition tests whether internal changes in organizational routines are associated with incremental rather than transformative innovation. Results from mediation analysis using structural equation models confirm that the initial negative effect of external and internal learning mechanisms on innovation can be eliminated, on the one hand, by engaging in more diverse cross-sector collaborations to increase transformative innovations and, on the other hand, by focusing on changing administrative routines to support incremental innovation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据