4.6 Article

Internationalization and knowledge management strategies of service firms: impact of regulatory environment in regional markets

期刊

JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
卷 26, 期 9, 页码 2177-2194

出版社

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/JKM-06-2021-0425

关键词

Australia; Knowledge management; Professional service firms; European Union; Brexit; Trade in services; Professional services

资金

  1. EU Trade and Business Relationship [LP0990000]
  2. Australian Research Council (ARC) Linkage Project -Australian
  3. Australian Research Council [LP0990000] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the impact of regulations on Australian professional service firms' market entry in the European Union, highlighting barriers to knowledge transfer. It discusses using the UK as an EU base, mutual recognition of qualifications, and the dual nationality of architects as strategies to overcome restrictions.
Purpose This study aims to the influence and impact of regulations and highlights the barriers to market entry faced by Australian professional service firms in the European Union (EU) and their strategies to manage and transfer tacit knowledge. Design/methodology/approach The authors collected data by reviewing relevant regulatory documents and conducting semi-structured interviews with key informants from Australian architecture firms and senior representatives from the professional, trade and regulatory bodies in Australia and Europe. Findings Historically, Australian professional service firms use the United Kingdom (UK) as their EU base. The mutual recognition of qualifications and prior experiences are barriers to intra-organizational expatriation and knowledge transfer. The study identifies the dual nationality of the architects as a way of circumventing the residency/nationality restrictions. Originality/value The study discusses Brexit and how the uncertainty surrounding the UK and EU's agreement adds to the complexity for non-European firms' market entry and operations in the region.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据