4.5 Review

AI in marketing, consumer research and psychology: A systematic literature review and research agenda

期刊

PSYCHOLOGY & MARKETING
卷 39, 期 4, 页码 755-776

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mar.21619

关键词

artificial intelligence; AI; big data and robots; decision making and cognitive processes; machine learning and linguistic analysis; memory and computational logic; neural networks; social media content analytics; social media and text mining; systematic literature review; technology acceptance and adoption

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study provides an integrated view on the body of knowledge of artificial intelligence in marketing, consumer research, and psychology literature, identifying eight topical clusters and 412 theoretical lenses used in these studies. The research agenda proposed aims to advance the scholarly debate on AI with an emphasis on cross-fertilization of theories and neglected research topics.
This study is the first to provide an integrated view on the body of knowledge of artificial intelligence (AI) published in the marketing, consumer research, and psychology literature. By leveraging a systematic literature review using a data-driven approach and quantitative methodology (including bibliographic coupling), this study provides an overview of the emerging intellectual structure of AI research in the three bodies of literature examined. We identified eight topical clusters: (1) memory and computational logic; (2) decision making and cognitive processes; (3) neural networks; (4) machine learning and linguistic analysis; (5) social media and text mining; (6) social media content analytics; (7) technology acceptance and adoption; and (8) big data and robots. Furthermore, we identified a total of 412 theoretical lenses used in these studies with the most frequently used being: (1) the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology; (2) game theory; (3) theory of mind; (4) theory of planned behavior; (5) computational theories; (6) behavioral reasoning theory; (7) decision theories; and (8) evolutionary theory. Finally, we propose a research agenda to advance the scholarly debate on AI in the three literatures studied with an emphasis on cross-fertilization of theories used across fields, and neglected research topics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据