4.7 Article

Does demand-side flexibility reduce emissions? Exploring the social acceptability of demand management in Germany and Great Britain

期刊

ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE
卷 82, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102290

关键词

Demand side response; Flexible energy demand; Carbon emissions; Social acceptability; Energy policy

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), United Kingdom [EP/M024652/1]
  2. European Fund for Reginal Development, the Virtual Institute Smart Energy (VISE) [EFRE-0600036, EFRE-0600037]
  3. EPSRC [EP/M024652/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study compares Germany and Great Britain in terms of demand-side flexibility using surveys, observations and modeling. While participants in both countries show high willingness to participate in time variant tariffs, implementation may need to be context specific. Germany benefits most from flexibility during daytime in summer, while flexibility in Great Britain contributes most during winter evenings.
The rapid uptake of renewable energy sources requires new forms of flexibility in electricity systems, including a more responsive demand-side. The social acceptability, scale and economic value of flexible demand remain subjects of conjecture. In this paper we inform this debate with a multi-methods approach using three instruments: surveys, observations and modelling. This multi-method approach brings out similarities and differences between Germany and Great Britain in relation to demand-side flexibility. Participants in both countries express a high willingness to participate in time variant tariffs, but their implementation may need to be context specific. In Germany national peak demand occurs at midday, when PV generation results in lower emission factors. Conversely, British peak demand is in the early evening when emission factors are at their highest. The differences in responses allow us to explore important technical and cultural differences affecting the need for flexibility. Germany gains most from flexibility during the daytime in summer, while flexibility in Great Britain contributes most during winter evenings. We observe high degrees of acceptability of time-variant electricity tariffs (55%) and willingness to shift demand is high, resulting in peak demand reductions of up to 14.5%. However, the resulting cost and carbon savings of these efforts is less than 2% in both countries. We conclude that short term carbon or cost savings may be less powerful motivators for load shifting measures than long term system decarbonisation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据