4.7 Article

Adopting autonomous vehicles: The moderating effects of demographic variables

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102687

关键词

Autonomous vehicles; Modified TAM; Integration moderation; Social influence; Gender; Family size

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explored the factors influencing customers' intention to use autonomous vehicles, such as perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, social influence, and facilitating conditions, as well as the moderating effects of demographic variables. The findings show that social influence, facilitating conditions, and perceived usefulness are important variables affecting customer acceptance of autonomous vehicles.
Autonomous vehicles (AV) are considered one of the most disruptive technology innovations due to issues of customers' acceptance based on safety, ethics, etc. Along with the rapid advancement of smart cities' demand for this technology, getting customer acceptance of this futuristic technology is a serious concern in the AV industry. This paper modified the technology acceptance model to find out factors influencing customers' intention to use AV such as perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, social influence, and facilitating condition, and the moderating effects of demographic variables (gender, age, family size, income, education level, and marital status) on the relationship between predictors and intention to use AV. Online questionnaires were distributed to 318 participants in South Korea and the data was analyzed through multiple regression and integration moderation test. The findings show that social influence, facilitating conditions, and perceived usefulness are three important variables of AV usage intention. In addition, demographic variables (age, marital status, family size, and educational level) can moderate effect of PU and SI on intention to use AV. Strategic directions are suggested to managers to increase the possibility of customers' acceptance of AV.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据