4.4 Article

Altruistic helping in young children with ASD: A preliminary study

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2021.104067

关键词

Autism spectrum disorder; Down syndrome; Altruistic behavior

资金

  1. CAPES/Proex [0653/2018]
  2. CAPES/PrInt [88887.310343/2018-00]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that young children with ASD engage less frequently in altruistic behavior compared to those with Down syndrome. It also showed a significant negative correlation between the severity of autism symptoms and altruistic behavior in the ASD group. Nonverbal IQ level did not show significant correlations with performance in altruistic behavior tasks for either group. Overall, the study suggests that regardless of intellectual skills, the ability to engage in altruistic behavior is compromised in young children with ASD.
It has long been claimed that individuals with an autism spectrum disorder (ASD) show impaired prosocial behavior, however there is little direct evidence in support of this claim and inconsistencies have been reported in the literature. Therefore, the goal of this study was to compare the levels of altruistic behavior in 15 young children with an ASD and 14 children with Down syndrome, paired in chronological age (age range between 2 years and 8 months and 6 years and 2 months) and non-verbal intellectual ability. Our results showed that children with an ASD engaged less frequently in altruistic behavior compared to the DS group. In addition, we found a significant negative correlation between the severity of autism symptoms and altruistic behavior in the ASD group, suggesting that the more severe the symptoms of ASD, the less frequent the altruistic behaviors. Conversely, no significant correlations were found between nonverbal IQ level and performance in the altruistic behavior tasks, in either group. Overall, our results suggest that, regardless of intellectual skills, the ability to engage in altruistic behavior is compromised in young children with ASD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据