4.8 Article

Companies' adoption of Smart Technologies to achieve structural ambidexterity: an analysis with SEM

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121187

关键词

Ambidexterity; Industry 4; 0; Smart technologies; Structural equation modelling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The transition to Industry 4.0 and adoption of Smart Technologies can improve productivity and competitiveness, but sustainable competitive advantage depends on a company's ability to exploit current assets and explore new ways of creating value. Smart Technologies act as antecedents of structural ambidexterity, impacting innovation performance in manufacturing firms.
The transition to Industry 4.0 '' and the adoption of Smart Technologies (STs) are generally driven by expectations of gains in productivity, better control over operations and supply chain processes and, therefore, improved competitiveness. These factors are important to achieve success, but sustainable competitive advantage depends on a company's ability to exploit its current assets, while simultaneously exploring new ways of producing value. The ambidextrous balancing of these two areas requires concerted effort and the capacity to balance paradoxical tensions. Literature has thoroughly covered the aspect of how to overcome the trade-off between exploitation and exploration. However, research has only recently started focusing on the pivotal role that digital technologies may play in this process. Our paper contributes to this nascent literature stream by investigating how STs can operate as antecedents of structural ambidexterity. This study relies on the 3rd CINet Survey (2016-2017) involving over 370 companies worldwide. Leveraging on STs and structural ambidexterity as mediators, we used Structural Equation Modelling to show that manufacturing firms with good business performance are in a favorable position to achieve better innovation performances. Our results shed new light on the current debate around the Industry 4.0 transition, with implications for both academics and practitioners.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据