4.5 Article

A new cognitive model of long-term memory for intentions

期刊

COGNITION
卷 215, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104817

关键词

Intention; Mathematical cognitive model; Long-term memory; Task switching; Prospective memory; Task-set; Temporally extended agency

资金

  1. Independent Research Fund Denmark [DFF - 610700058]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper proposes a new mathematical model for retrieval of intentions from long-term memory and discusses the different perspectives of memory in temporally extended agency presented by two psychological theories. The aim is to test which conception provides the best explanation through a new experimental paradigm.
In this paper, we propose a new mathematical model of retrieval of intentions from long-term memory. We model retrieval as a stochastic race between a plurality of potentially relevant intentions stored in long-term memory. Psychological theories are dominated by two opposing conceptions of the role of memory in tempo-rally extended agency - as when a person has to remember to make a phone call in the afternoon because, in the morning, she promised she would do so. According to the Working Memory conception, remembering to make the phone call is explained in terms of the construction and maintenance of intentions in working-memory. According to the Long-Term Memory conception, we should explain the episode in terms of an ability to store intentions in long-term memory. The two conceptions predict different processing profiles. The aim of this paper is to present a new mathematical model of the type of memory mechanism that could realise the long-term memory representations of intentions necessary for the Long-Term Memory conception. We present and illus-trate the formal model and propose a new type of experimental paradigm that could allow us to test which of the two conceptions provides the best explanation of the role of memory in temporally extended agency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据