期刊
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST
卷 76, 期 7, 页码 1097-1112出版社
AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/amp0000905
关键词
racism; psychological science; epistemic oppression; research dissemination; social justice
The article highlights the epistemic oppression within psychological science and offers specific recommendations for change. It also discusses accountability steps to move psychology beyond talk and towards action.
As efforts to end systemic racism gain momentum across various contexts, it is critical to consider antiracist steps needed to improve psychological science. Current scientific practices may serve to maintain white supremacy with significant and impactful consequences. Extant research practices reinforce norms of homogeneity within BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, and other People of Color) populations, segregate theories, and methods derived from BIPOC groups, apply disparate standards to the evaluation of research on white versus BIPOC populations, and discourage BIPOC scholars from pursuing research careers. Perhaps consequently, disparities persist on a range of psychologically relevant outcomes (e.g., mental and physical health). This article presents examples of how epistemic oppression exists within psychological science, including in how science is conducted, reported, reviewed, and disseminated. This article offers a needed contribution by providing specific concrete recommendations for different stakeholders, including those involved in the production, reporting, and gatekeeping of science as well as consumers of science. Additionally, a discussion of accountability steps are offered to ensure that psychological science moves beyond talk and toward action, with possible strategies to measure outcomes, stimulate progress, promote dialogue and action, challenge inequity, and upend the influence of white supremacy in psychological science. Public Significance Statement Challenging systemic racism requires multisystemic change. In this article, potential solutions and measurable outcome metrics to eliminate white supremacy in psychological science are provided.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据