4.4 Article

Patterns of Daily Motor-Symptom Control with Carbidopa/Levodopa Enteral Suspension Versus Oral Carbidopa/Levodopa Therapy in Advanced Parkinson's Disease: Clinical Trial Post Hoc Analyses

期刊

NEUROLOGY AND THERAPY
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 711-723

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s40120-022-00332-0

关键词

Carbidopa; levodopa; Carbidopa; levodopa enteral suspension; Carbidopa; levodopa intestinal gel; Duopa; Duodopa; Dyskinesia; Parkinson's disease

资金

  1. AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, USA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In advanced Parkinson's disease, patients' motor-symptom states and the timing at which they occur can impact patients' quality of life and ability to complete activities of daily living. Carbidopa/levodopa enteral suspension may provide more consistent motor-symptom control throughout the day compared to orally administered carbidopa/levodopa.
Plain Language Summary In advanced Parkinson's disease, patients' motor-symptom states (such as on time without troublesome dyskinesia [good on time] and off time), and the timing at which they occur, can impact patients' quality of life and ability to complete activities of daily living. Carbidopa/levodopa enteral suspension is administered continuously into the jejunum, potentially reducing some of the motor-state variation that is common with orally administered carbidopa/levodopa, including delayed on time after waking and transitions between off and on throughout the day. In post hoc analyses of clinical trial data, patterns of motor-states across the waking day were compared between carbidopa/levodopa enteral suspension and orally administered immediate-release carbidopa/levodopa at week 12. Outcomes included time to good on after waking; occurrence of extreme fluctuations between off time and on time with troublesome dyskinesia; time in each motor-state during 4-h intervals across the day; and frequency of motor-state transitions. Three times as many carbidopa/levodopa enteral suspension-treated patients achieved good on within 30 min of waking after 12 weeks versus baseline, whereas no significant change was observed for the orally administered immediate-release carbidopa/levodopa group. Compared to orally administered immediate-release carbidopa/levodopa-treated patients, fewer carbidopa/levodopa enteral suspension-treated patients experienced extreme fluctuations, had greater reductions in motor-state transitions, and greater reductions in duration of off during three of the four intervals in the day. These findings provide a first look at the impact of carbidopa/levodopa enteral suspension on motor-state patterns throughout the day, and suggest that carbidopa/levodopa enteral suspension provides more consistent motor-symptom control and predictable benefit throughout the day than orally administered carbidopa/levodopa. Introduction A clinical trial in advanced Parkinson's disease (APD) has established the superiority of carbidopa/levodopa enteral suspension (CLES) in reducing total patient off time (OFF) and increasing total on time without troublesome dyskinesia (ON-woTD) over orally administered immediate-release carbidopa/levodopa tablets (IR-CL). However, temporal patterns of these improvements throughout the waking day have not been examined. In this analysis, time to ON-woTD after waking and patterns of motor-symptom control throughout the waking day were compared between CLES and IR-CL. Methods Post hoc analyses of APD patient-diary data from the phase 3 randomized controlled trial were used to compare changes in time to ON-woTD after waking, motor-symptom control throughout the waking day, occurrence of extreme fluctuations between OFF and on with troublesome dyskinesia, and motor-state transitions with CLES versus IR-CL from baseline to week 12. Results The sample included 33 CLES-treated and 30 IR-CL-treated patients. Among the CLES group, the percentage of patient days achieving ON-woTD within 30 min of waking was three times higher at week 12 versus baseline (33% vs. 11%, p = 0.0043); no significant change occurred with IR-CL. When the waking day was divided into four 4-h periods, CLES versus IR-CL treatment produced significantly greater reductions in OFF during three periods, and two periods had increased ON-woTD. Fewer CLES-treated patients had extreme fluctuations at week 12 (3% vs. 23%, p = 0.0224) compared to IR-CL-treated patients. From baseline to week 12, CLES-treated patients had greater reductions in the average number of motor-state transitions compared to IR-CL-treated patients (- 1.6, p = 0.0295). Conclusion CLES-treated patients experienced a more rapid onset of ON-woTD after waking and greater consistency of ON-woTD throughout their waking day than IR-CL-treated patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据