4.7 Article

Adhesion and Stiffness Matching in Epoxy-Vitrimers/Strain Sensor Fiber Laminates

期刊

ACS APPLIED POLYMER MATERIALS
卷 4, 期 2, 页码 1264-1275

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsapm.1c01648

关键词

soft robotics; elastomeric vitrimer; electrically conductive composites; matrix-sensor fiber laminates; stiffness matching

资金

  1. European Union [828818]
  2. CNRS
  3. ESPCI-PSL
  4. EMPA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hybrid networks synthesized from biosourced fatty acid fragments can tune the mechanical properties and incorporate strain sensors. These materials exhibit good thermostimulated welding ability and tunability, while maintaining the mechanical and electrical integrity of conductive fibers.
Hybrid networks, including physical and chemical cross-links, were synthesized from biosourced fatty acid fragments, linked to each other by a controlled number of nonexchangeable ether bonds, exchangeable ester bonds, and noncovalent hydrogen bonds. The mechanical properties of these networks are tuned by the ratio of di- versus tetraepoxide and the stoichiometry acid/epoxy. Creep tests and insolubility demonstrated the vitrimer or vitrimer-like nature of the resulting materials. The thermostimulated welding ability of the materials was exploited to incorporate strain sensors by embedding electrically conductive fibers into the rubbery vitrimer matrix. Both the efficiency of the welding procedure at moderate temperatures (80 degrees C) and the tunability of mechanical properties are attractive assets for the effective incorporation of thermodegradable conductive fibers while preserving their mechanical and electrical integrity. The mechanical and electrical behaviors of the sensor composites were simultaneously tested, either in quasi-static or in cyclic tensile experiments, at room temperature and at a larger distance from T-g of the matrices. The study emphasizes the importance of matching Young's moduli of components in composite samples, which is strongly temperature-dependent.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据