4.7 Article

Liquid Processing of Bismuth-Silica Nanoparticle/Aluminum Matrix Nanocomposites for Heat Storage Applications

期刊

ACS APPLIED NANO MATERIALS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsanm.1c03534

关键词

aluminum; composites; nanoparticles; core-shell; bismuth; heat storage; phase change

资金

  1. Stellantis
  2. ANRT
  3. OpenLab betachiPhi involving Stellantis
  4. Sorbonne University
  5. Institut des Materiaux de Paris Centre [IMPC FR2482]
  6. Laboratoire de Reactivite de Surface [UMR 7197]
  7. Sorbonne Universite
  8. CNRS
  9. C'Nano projects of the Region Ile-de-France

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we have developed a liquid-phase processing technique to design aluminum matrix nanocomposites with phase change nanoparticles. The research demonstrates that the silica shell acts as a barrier, preventing extensive coalescence of particles and broadening the phase change temperature range.
Metal matrix nanocomposites encompassing low melting point metal nano-inclusions are promising candidates for thermal regulation of devices at high temperature. They are usually processed by solid-state routes that provide access to a limited range of materials and are hardly compatible with complex shaping processes and with large-scale applications. Herein, we develop a liquid-phase processing technique to design aluminum matrix nanocomposites made of phase change nanoparticles, using bismuth nanoparticles as a proof-of-concept. The bismuth nanoparticles derived from colloidal chemistry are first encapsulated in a silica shell and then dispersed by ultrasonication into molten aluminum. Using X-ray diffraction, electron microscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, we probe the evolution of the bismuth particles and of the inorganic shell. We demonstrate that the silica shell acts as a barrier against extensive coalescence of particles during the dispersion process, thus enabling a decrease and a widening of the phase change temperature range.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据