4.7 Article

Gold Nanoparticles Adsorbed on Graphene as Nanozymes for the Efficient Elimination of Dye Pollutants

期刊

ACS APPLIED NANO MATERIALS
卷 5, 期 1, 页码 94-100

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsanm.1c03287

关键词

nanozymes; environment treatment; dye pollution; catalysis; adsorption

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation [21771150]
  2. Fujian Provincial Department of Science and Technology [2019J06001]
  3. 111 Project [B16029]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research presented the construction of graphene-gold nanoparticle nanozymes via a one-step hydrothermal reaction, demonstrating efficient dye scavenging ability and catalytic mechanism similar to natural enzymes. The nanozymes may find applications in various research areas such as environmental treatment, sensing, and biotechnology.
Over the past several decades, the design and development of nanomaterials with intrinsic enzyme-mimicking activities (nanozymes) have attracted increasing attention. Herein, we present a simple strategy for the construction of graphene-gold nanoparticle (Graphene/Au-NPs) nanozymes via a one-step hydrothermal reaction, which can act as a highly efficient dye scavenger with the synergetic effect of adsorption and degradation. The asprepared nanocomposites can overcome the intrinsic drawbacks of singlecomponent Au-NPs, such as ease of aggregation and cannot capture substrates effectively. In our catalytic system, Graphene/Au-NPs can readily adsorb organic dyes onto their surfaces, catalyze H2O2 to generate (OH)-O-center dot radicals, and then exhibit outstanding removal performance toward different organic dyes. Their catalytic mechanism is analogous to that of natural enzymes, in which the specific high catalytic efficiency depends mainly on their capacity to keep the substrate close to the active site of the enzyme. Collectively, our work may pave the way to apply multifunctional nanozymes in different research areas, such as environmental treatment, sensing, and biotechnology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据