4.6 Article

Novel higher order iterative schemes based on the q-Calculus for solving nonlinear equations

期刊

AIMS MATHEMATICS
卷 7, 期 3, 页码 3524-3553

出版社

AMER INST MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES-AIMS
DOI: 10.3934/math.2022196

关键词

Daftardar-Gejji Jafari decomposition technique; iterative schemes; convergence order; Taylor's series in the q-calculus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Quantum calculus, focusing on q-symmetrical outcomes free from limits, rationalizes differentiation and integration operations logically. The paper analyzes its application in iterative methods for solving nonlinear equations, introducing q-iterative methods and investigating their convergence order. The approximate solutions obtained show comparable performance with classical calculus as the quantum parameter q approaches one.
The conventional infinitesimal calculus that concentrates on the idea of navigating the q-symmetrical outcomes free from the limits is known as Quantum calculus (or q-calculus). It focuses on the logical rationalization of differentiation and integration operations. Quantum calculus arouses interest in the modern era due to its broad range of applications in diversified disciplines of the mathematical sciences. In this paper, we instigate the analysis of Quantum calculus on the iterative methods for solving one-variable nonlinear equations. We introduce the new iterative methods called q-iterative methods by employing the q-analogue of Taylor's series together with the inclusion of an auxiliary function. We also investigate the convergence order of our newly suggested methods. Multiple numerical examples are utilized to demonstrate the performance of new methods with an acceptable accuracy. In addition, approximate solutions obtained are comparable to the analogous solutions in the classical calculus when the quantum parameter q tends to one. Furthermore, a potential correlation is established by uniting the q-iterative methods and traditional iterative methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据