4.5 Article

Evaluation of pit dimensions and uptake of preservative solutions in wood after permeability improvement by bioincising

期刊

WOOD MATERIAL SCIENCE & ENGINEERING
卷 18, 期 1, 页码 233-243

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17480272.2021.2014956

关键词

Picea orientalis L.; copper distribution; SEM-EDX; microscopic structure; pits; Physisporinus vitreus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bioincising using Physisporinus vitreus has been studied to improve the permeability of Picea orientalis L. wood. The effects of treatment methods and the distribution of copper were evaluated. The degradation of pits was found to be the most important factor in improving the penetration and uptake of preservative solutions.
Bioincising is a biotechnological process to improve the permeability of wood by biological organisms. In recent years, there has been a great interest to determine the changes in the anatomical structure of wood as a result of bioincising process. In this study, the effects of bioincising by Physisporinus vitreus on the pit structure and permeability of Picea orientalis L. sapwood and heartwood were studied. Bioincised and non-bioincised samples were then treated with micronized copper quaternary and Celcure AC-500 wood preservatives by either dipping or vacuum method. The copper distribution and amount of copper retained in treated wood were evaluated by SEM-EDX and ICP-OES, respectively. The area of copper fixation in treated wood was also measured by the ArcGIS software package. The effects of P. vitreus activity were examined in the wood microstructure after bioincising by light microscope and SEM analyses on radial sections. After the bioincising, a significant increase was observed in the uptake of wood preservatives by vacuum, particularly in heartwood. The measurements on bordered pit, crossfield pit, and ray tracheid bordered pit dimensions in the microstructure of wood indicated that the degradation of pits was the most important factor in improved penetration and uptake of preservative solutions employed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据