4.5 Article

Effectiveness of nurse-led counselling and education on self-efficacy of patients with acute coronary syndrome: A randomized controlled trial

期刊

NURSING OPEN
卷 9, 期 1, 页码 775-784

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/nop2.1129

关键词

acute coronary syndrome; counselling; education; nurse; person-centred care; self-efficacy

类别

资金

  1. research council of Shahroud University of Medical Sciences [9723]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to investigate the impact of nurse-led counselling and education using a person-centred care approach on short-term cardiac self-efficacy in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Results showed that cardiac self-efficacy, including the ability to control symptoms and maintain function, was significantly higher in the intervention group compared to the control group after the intervention.
Aim: Adherence to lifestyle recommendations, medical regimens and cardiac rehabilitation is poor among patients with acute coronary syndrome. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of nurse-led counselling and education using a person-centred care approach on short-term cardiac self-efficacy in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Design: A parallel, two-armed, randomized controlled trial was conducted. Methods: One hundred twenty patients who were hospitalized with diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome were selected and randomly assigned into intervention (n = 60) or control (n = 60) groups. In the intervention group, in addition to routine care, the nurse-led counselling and education programme included two face-to-face sessions, two telephone counselling and education sessions, using the person-centred care approach. Participants in the control group received only routine care. Data were collected using the cardiac self-efficacy scale before the intervention and 1 month after discharge. Results: After the intervention, we found that cardiac self-efficacy, including the perceived self-efficacy to control symptoms and maintain function, was statistically significantly higher in the intervention group than the control group.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据