4.4 Article

Vestibular Aqueduct Morphology and Meniere's Disease-Development of the Vestibular Aqueduct Score by 3D Analysis

期刊

FRONTIERS IN SURGERY
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.747517

关键词

vestibular aqueduct (VA); 3D analysis; temporal bone; saccotomy; computed tomography; Meniere's disease

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Improved radiological examinations with newly developed 3D models can increase understanding of Meniere's disease (MD). By measuring the angle and length of the vestibular aqueduct (VA) in the temporal bone, and constructing a 3D model to develop the vestibular aqueduct score (VAS), it can be effectively used for diagnostic investigation.
Improved radiological examinations with newly developed 3D models may increase understanding of Meniere's disease (MD). The morphology and course of the vestibular aqueduct (VA) in the temporal bone might be related to the severity of MD. The presented study explored, if the VA of MD and non-MD patients can be grouped relative to its angle to the semicircular canals (SCC) and length using a 3D model. Scans of temporal bone specimens (TBS) were performed using micro-CT and micro flat panel volume computed tomography (mfpVCT). Furthermore, scans were carried out in patients and TBS by computed tomography (CT). The angle between the VA and the three SCC, as well as the length of the VA were measured. From these data, a 3D model was constructed to develop the vestibular aqueduct score (VAS). Using different imaging modalities it was demonstrated that angle measurements of the VA are reliable and can be effectively used for detailed diagnostic investigation. To test the clinical relevance, the VAS was applied on MD and on non-MD patients. Length and angle values from MD patients differed from non-MD patients. In MD patients, significantly higher numbers of VAs could be assigned to a distinct group of the VAS. In addition, it was tested, whether the outcome of a treatment option for MD can be correlated to the VAS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据