4.1 Review

Leucine rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) peptide modulators: Recent advances and future directions

期刊

PEPTIDE SCIENCE
卷 114, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pep2.24251

关键词

allosteric inhibitor; constrained peptide; LRRK2; peptide inhibitor; protein-protein interface

资金

  1. Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research [11425.07, 8068.03, 8068.04]
  2. Parkinson's Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

LRRK2 is a common genetic contributor to Parkinson's disease, with pathogenic mutations often leading to increased kinase activity that can be inhibited by small molecules, but these inhibitors are limited by toxicity. Recent research has focused on protein-protein interactions involving LRRK2 and their role in PD, with potential for constrained peptides and peptidomimetics to target LRRK2.
Leucine rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) is the most common genetic contributor to Parkinson's disease (PD), a complex neurodegenerative disorder affecting nearly 10 million people worldwide. Pathogenic mutations within LRRK2 often induce increased kinase activity, an effect that can be abolished with many small molecule inhibitors; however, these small molecule inhibitors are currently limited by their toxicities. Given the large and complex nature of LRRK2, more recent efforts have focused on protein-protein interactions (PPIs) involving LRRK2 and how they can contribute to PD. Here, we review recently resolved structures of LRRK2 and highlight unique interfaces driving both catalytic and non-catalytic activities. Combining new structural information with established in vitro and in vivo data clarifies the role of PPIs in driving LRRK2-mediated disease pathogenesis. Since constrained peptides and peptidomimetics have the potential to engage with elongated, hydrophobic interfaces that were previously considered undruggable, they may provide a unique handle for LRRK2 targeting. Here, we discuss the use of constrained peptides and peptidomimetics to target LRRK2 as a strategy to downregulate its pathological activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据