4.4 Article

Health Promotion Capacity Among Chinese Healthcare Professionals and Its Influence on Preventive Health Service Practices

期刊

JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY HEALTHCARE
卷 15, 期 -, 页码 343-352

出版社

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S349449

关键词

healthcare professionals; health promotion; primary care; capacity

资金

  1. Zhejiang Province Philosophy and Social Science Planning Project [:22NDJC135YB]
  2. Zhejiang College Students' Science and Technology Innovation Program (Xin-Miao Talent Plan) [:2021R426069]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the health promotion capacity of Chinese healthcare professionals and found a correlation between health promotion capacity and preventive health service practices.
Background: This study evaluated the current health promotion capacity level of Chinese healthcare professionals and explored the association between health promotion capacity and preventive health service practices. Methods: A total of 124 doctors and 72 nurses were recruited from 6 county hospitals and 12 community health centers from June to August 2019 in Zhejiang Province, China. Health promotion capacity was measured using the revised Chinese version of the Health Promotion Professionals Core Competency Scale. Results: The mean total score on the health promotion capacity scale was 45.04 (SD = 7.30). Total health promotion capacity score was negatively associated with county hospitals (beta = -0.32, p < 0.001; Ref: community health center) and positively associated with a monthly income of more than 5001 RMB ($786.39) (beta = 0.25, p = 0.004; Ref: less than 5000 RMB ($786.24)). All domain scores of the health promotion capacity scale were positively related to preventive health service practices. Conclusion: Health promotion capacity is one of the most important capacities among healthcare professionals, and there is a particular need to improve nurses' capacity. A higher level of health promotion capacity is beneficial for implementing preventive health services.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据