4.3 Article

Magnetic Field Perturbations to a Soft X-ray-Activated Fe (II) Molecular Spin State Transition

期刊

MAGNETOCHEMISTRY
卷 7, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/magnetochemistry7100135

关键词

spin crossover; Fe (II) complex; activation barriers; X-ray excitation; magnetic field effects; [Fe{H2B(pz)(2)}(2)(bipy)]; molecular multiferroic

资金

  1. National Science Foundation through NSF-DMR [2003057]
  2. EPSCoR RII Track-1: Emergent Quantum Materials and Technologies (EQUATE) [OIA-2044049]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  4. DOEs Office of Science [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  5. Advanced Light Source Graduate student fellowship
  6. Division Of Materials Research
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [2003057] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The X-ray-induced spin crossover transition of an Fe (II) molecular thin film was studied with and without a magnetic field. The thermal activation energy barrier for this transition was found to decrease in the presence of a magnetic field, leading to deviations from the expected spin state transition behavior. Additionally, the orbital moment was observed to decrease with increasing temperature relative to the spin moment near room temperature.
The X-ray-induced spin crossover transition of an Fe (II) molecular thin film in the presence and absence of a magnetic field has been investigated. The thermal activation energy barrier in the soft X-ray activation of the spin crossover transition for [Fe{H2B(pz)(2)}(2)(bipy)] molecular thin films is reduced in the presence of an applied magnetic field, as measured through X-ray absorption spectroscopy at various temperatures. The influence of a 1.8 T magnetic field is sufficient to cause deviations from the expected exponential spin state transition behavior which is measured in the field free case. We find that orbital moment diminishes with increasing temperature, relative to the spin moment in the vicinity of room temperature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据