4.5 Article

Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors-A Comprehensive Review of Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Multidisciplinary Management

期刊

CHILDREN-BASEL
卷 9, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/children9010038

关键词

malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor; MEK inhibitor; multi-disciplinary management; neurofibroma; neurofibromatosis type 1

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) are aggressive soft tissue sarcomas with nerve sheath differentiation. They have a tendency to metastasize and are relatively common in individuals with neurofibromatosis type 1. The staging of MPNSTs is complex and requires multi-disciplinary collaboration. Surgical management is the primary approach, with non-surgical modalities playing a supportive role. Advances in molecular characterization have allowed the integration of targeted inhibitors into MPNST management.
Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) are aggressive soft tissue sarcomas (STS) with nerve sheath differentiation and a tendency to metastasize. Although occurring at an incidence of 0.001% in the general population, they are relatively common in individuals with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), for whom the lifetime risk approaches 10%. The staging of MPNSTs is complicated and requires close multi-disciplinary collaboration. Their primary management is most often surgical in nature, with non-surgical modalities playing a supportive, necessary role, particularly in metastatic, invasive, or widespread disease. We, therefore, sought to provide a comprehensive review of the relevant literature describing the characteristics of these tumors, their pathophysiology and risk factors, their diagnosis, and their multi-disciplinary treatment. A close partnership between surgical and medical oncologists is therefore necessary. Advances in the molecular characterization of these tumors have also begun to allow the integration of targeted RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathway inhibitors into MPNST management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据