4.6 Article

Structural basis of Nrd1- Nab3 heterodimerization

期刊

LIFE SCIENCE ALLIANCE
卷 5, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

LIFE SCIENCE ALLIANCE LLC
DOI: 10.26508/lsa.202101252

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. MCIN/AEI [PID2020-112821GB-I00, CTQ2017-84371-P, BFU2017-84694-P, RED2018-102467-T]
  2. ERDF A way of making Europe
  3. Biomedicine program of Community of Madrid [B2017/BMD-3770]
  4. ERDF
  5. ESFESF
  6. Junta de Castilla y Leon (Programa Escalera de Excelencia de la Junta de Castilla y Leon - O.P. ERDF from Castilla y Leon 14-20) [CLU-2017-03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heterodimerization of RNA binding proteins Nrd1 and Nab3 is crucial for yeast cell fitness, and the structure of Nrd1-Nab3 resembles that of Rna14/Rna15 despite sequence and evolutionary differences.
Heterodimerization of RNA binding proteins Nrd1 and Nab3 is essential to communicate the RNA recognition in the nascent transcript with the Nrd1 recognition of the Ser5-phosphorylated Rbp1 C-terminal domain in RNA polymerase II. The structure of a Nrd1-Nab3 chimera reveals the basis of heterodimerization, filling a missing gap in knowledge of this system. The free form of the Nrd1 interaction domain of Nab3 (NRID) forms a multi-state three-helix bundle that is clamped in a single conformation upon complex formation with the Nab3 interaction domain of Nrd1 (NAID). The latter domain forms two long helices that wrap around NRID, resulting in an extensive protein-protein interface that would explain the highly favorable free energy of heterodimerization. Mutagenesis of some conserved hydrophobic residues involved in the heterodimerization leads to temperature-sensitive phenotypes, revealing the importance of this interaction in yeast cell fitness. The Nrd1-Nab3 structure resembles the previously reported Rna14/Rna15 heterodimer structure, which is part of the poly(A)-dependent termination pathway, suggesting that both machineries use similar structural solutions despite they share little sequence homology and are potentially evolutionary divergent.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据