4.7 Article

Methanol oxidation on sputter-coated platinum oxide catalysts

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 41, 期 1, 页码 265-275

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.09.147

关键词

Platinum oxide; Methanol oxidation; Magnetron sputtering; Carbon film; Microreactor; Hydrogen production

资金

  1. EU (FP7 NMP project ChipCAT) [310191]
  2. Czech Science Foundation [13-10396S]
  3. GAUK project [1662214]
  4. Czech Ministry of Education [LD13054]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Platinum oxide (PtOx) and metallic platinum (Pt) layers deposited by means of radio frequency (rf) magnetron sputtering were examined as potential catalysts for partial oxidation of methanol (POM) reaction (CH3OH + 1/2O(2)-> 2H(2) + CO2) under realistic conditions. Flat Si(100) support and oxygen-plasma etched amorphous carbon films (a-C) were used as substrates for PtOx. Elemental composition and morphology of the catalysts were characterized by x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). XPS analysis of PtOx demonstrates change in its chemical state during the reaction leading to metallic layer with small amounts of stable Pt2+ cations which turns out to be crucial for its catalytic properties, while SEM reveals significant cracking and roughening of the oxide thin films. A reference Pt/Si catalyst, on the contrary, shows no significant differences prior and after the methanol oxidation reaction but lacks to PtOx in both activity (in terms of H-2 production rate) and selectivity for POM, generating relatively high amounts of CO which can poison the catalyst surface. PtOx deposited on the porous a-C outperforms the same oxide grown directly on Si, especially in its POM selectivity exceeding 90%. Both oxidic systems, however, require an initial conditioning under real reaction conditions to reach their optimal catalytic capability. (C) Copyright 2015, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据