4.6 Article

Knowledge Sharing Strategy and Emission Reduction Benefits of Low Carbon Technology Collaborative Innovation in the Green Supply Chain

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2021.783835

关键词

low carbon technology; knowledge sharing; collaborative innovation; differential game; emission reduction benefits

资金

  1. MOE (Ministry of Education in China) Project of Humanities and Social Sciences [19YJC630078]
  2. Fund of Innovative Education Program for Graduate Students at North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power [YK2020-09]
  3. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFC0406905]
  4. Youth Talents Teachers Scheme of Henan Province Universities [2018GGJS080]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71974056, 71302191]
  6. Promotion Special Project of Henan Province (Tackling key science and Technology) [212102310392]
  7. China Scholarship Council [201908410388, GG201828]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the dynamic strategy and benefits of knowledge sharing (KS) in the green supply chain (GSC) using differential game method. The results show that under centralized decision-making, the KS efforts of suppliers and manufacturers are the highest, resulting in the best knowledge accumulation and emission reduction benefits in the GSC. Cost-sharing mechanism can further improve the supplier's KS effort level. Additionally, carbon trading price and knowledge decay rate have significant impacts on KS.
Knowledge sharing (KS) in the green supply chain (GSC) is jointly determined by the KS efforts of suppliers and manufacturers. This study uses the differential game method to explore the dynamic strategy of KS and the benefits of emission reduction in the process of low carbon (LC) technology in the GSC. The optimal trajectory of the knowledge stock and emission reduction benefits of suppliers and manufacturers under different strategies are obtained. The validity of the model and the results are verified by numerical simulation analysis, and the sensitivity analysis of the main parameters in the case of collaborative sharing is carried out. The results show that in the case of centralized decision-making, the KS efforts of suppliers and manufacturers are the highest, and the knowledge stock and emission reduction benefits of GSC are also the best. The cost-sharing mechanism can realize the Pareto improvement of GSC's knowledge stock and emission reduction benefits, but the cost-sharing mechanism can only increase the supplier's KS effort level. In addition, this study found that the price of carbon trading and the rate of knowledge decay have a significant impact on KS. The study provides a theoretical basis for promoting KS in the GSC and LC technology innovation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据