4.5 Article

Tannic Acid Modified Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube/Zinc Oxide Nanoparticle Thin Films for UV/Visible Semitransparent Photodiode-Type Photodetectors

期刊

CHEMPHOTOCHEM
卷 6, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cptc.202100208

关键词

carbon nanotubes; heterojunctions; photodetectors; photovoltaics; zinc

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin China [19JCZDJC37800, 20JCTPJC11900]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vertical UV to visible detectors based on TCNT/ZnO heterojunctions were prepared, showing high photocurrent, photoresponsivity, and detectivity, and maintained stable operation after bending tests. In contrast, devices with pure CNT electrodes exhibited poorer performance.
Flexible electronic devices have received significant attention in recent years as a result of their flexibility and portability. Carbon nanotube (CNT) films could serve as a promising material for photodetection because of their broad absorption spectral coverage. In this research, vertical ultraviolet (UV) to visible (UV/Vis) detectors based on tannic acid functionalized carbon nanotube/zinc oxide (TCNT/ZnO) heterojunctions were prepared by a simple spraying method. The TCNT electrode had excellent photoelectric properties with a sheet resistance of 40.6 Omega/sq and transmittance of 80.4 % at 550 nm, and the resulting TCNT/ZnO device could achieve photocurrent of 3.0 mA at 360 nm in the UV range, a recession time of 8.05 s, photoresponsivity of 7.12 A/W, and detectivity of 25.2x10(11) Jones. As a comparison, for the pure CNT electrode with a sheet resistance of 45.5 Omega/sq and transmittance of 79.6 % at 550 nm, the CNT/ZnO photocurrent was only 0.6 mA at 360 nm, with a recession time of 17.25 s, photoresponsivity of 1.00 A/W, and detectivity of 3.4x10(11) Jones. The prepared device was also able to operate stably after 1000 mechanical bending tests and maintained more than 95 % detectivity, providing a feasible path for the generation of carbon nanotube based photodetector devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据