4.7 Article

Intelligent models to predict hydrogen yield in dark microbial fermentations using existing knowledge

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 41, 期 30, 页码 12929-12940

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.05.250

关键词

Modeling; Biohydrogen production; Artificial Neural Network; Sensitivity analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bioprocess development for hydrogen production requires an excellent understanding of the influence of key operational parameters on hydrogen yields at early stages of the innovation chain. Knowledge on the impact of these key input parameters on fermentative hydrogen yields exist in the public domain. This study builds on this knowledge to implement intelligent models that could predict the hydrogen response on new physicochemical input values. Two Artificial Neural Network (ANN) models for hydrogen production were implemented and assessed using published data from 64 selected studies. For both models the multilayer perceptron (MLP) class of neural network was used with a topology of 5-7-7-1, corresponding to the number of neurons of input, hidden (two) and output layers. The input variables consisted of inoculum type, substrate type, substrate concentration, pH and temperature. The output was the hydrogen yield expressed as mole of hydrogen per mole of substrate (Mol_Model) or as cumulative volume of hydrogen per gram substrate (Vol_Model). A high coefficient of determination (R-2) was obtained for Vol_Model (0.90) whereas a low value was observed with Mol_Model (0.46). These findings showed that the Vol_Model efficiently abstracted the non-linear relationship between the considered inputs and biohydrogen yield with a higher prediction accuracy on new physicochemical parameters. Thus, these ANN derived models could be used to navigate the optimization space and shorten the biohydrogen process development time. (C) 2016 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据