4.6 Article

Plant-Derived Recombinant Vaccines against Zoonotic Viruses

期刊

LIFE-BASEL
卷 12, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/life12020156

关键词

recombinant vaccines; zoonotic viruses; virus-like particles; plant molecular farming; zoonotic influenza; emerging coronaviruses; West Nile virus; dengue virus; Zika virus; yellow fever virus; Ebola virus; Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus; Chikungunya virus; HIV; rabies virus; Hantaviruses; Henipaviruses; Newcastle virus; Hepatitis E virus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vaccination is the most effective way to restrict the spread of zoonotic viruses and prevent diseases. Recombinant proteins produced in plants offer a safe, effective, and inexpensive approach for vaccine development. Virus-like particles (VLPs) produced in plants, which can self-assemble and resemble the form of virus particles, are gaining popularity as candidate vaccines against various infectious diseases.
Emerging and re-emerging zoonotic diseases cause serious illness with billions of cases, and millions of deaths. The most effective way to restrict the spread of zoonotic viruses among humans and animals and prevent disease is vaccination. Recombinant proteins produced in plants offer an alternative approach for the development of safe, effective, inexpensive candidate vaccines. Current strategies are focused on the production of highly immunogenic structural proteins, which mimic the organizations of the native virion but lack the viral genetic material. These include chimeric viral peptides, subunit virus proteins, and virus-like particles (VLPs). The latter, with their ability to self-assemble and thus resemble the form of virus particles, are gaining traction among plant-based candidate vaccines against many infectious diseases. In this review, we summarized the main zoonotic diseases and followed the progress in using plant expression systems for the production of recombinant proteins and VLPs used in the development of plant-based vaccines against zoonotic viruses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据