4.6 Article

Selective Inhibition of IL-6 Trans-Signaling Has No Beneficial Effect on the Posttraumatic Cytokine Release after Multiple Trauma in Mice

期刊

LIFE-BASEL
卷 11, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/life11111252

关键词

multiple trauma; MODS; sgp130Fc; trans-signaling; inflammatory cytokines

资金

  1. Hannover Medical School [79420017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the use of a selective IL-6 trans-signaling inhibition in multiple trauma patients to prevent MODS. The results showed that the IL-6 trans-signaling inhibitor sgp130Fc had little effect on cytokine levels, indicating limited effectiveness in preventing the development of MODS.
While improvements in pre-hospital and in-hospital care allow more multiple trauma patients to advance to intensive care, the incidence of posttraumatic multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) is on the rise. Herein, the influence of a selective IL-6 trans-signaling inhibition on posttraumatic cytokine levels was investigated as an approach to prevent MODS caused by a dysbalanced posttraumatic immune reaction. Therefore, the artificial IL-6 trans-signaling inhibitor sgp130Fc was deployed in a murine multiple trauma model (femoral fracture plus bilateral chest trauma). The traumatized mice were treated with sgp130Fc (FP) and compared to untreated mice (WT) and IL-6 receptor knockout mice (RKO), which received the same traumas. The overall trauma mortality was 4.4%. Microscopic pulmonary changes were apparent after multiple trauma and after isolated bilateral chest trauma. Elevated IL-6, MCP-3 and RANTES plasma levels were measured after trauma, indicating a successful induction of a systemic inflammatory reaction. Significantly reduced IL-6 and RANTES plasma levels were visible in RKO compared to WT. Only a little effect was visible in FP compared to WT. Comparable cytokine levels in WT and FP indicate neither a protective nor an adverse effect of sgp130Fc on the cytokine release after femoral fracture and bilateral chest trauma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据