4.7 Article

Large Eddy Simulation of the flame stabilization process in a scramjet combustor with rearwall-expansion cavity

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 41, 期 42, 页码 19278-19288

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.09.012

关键词

Rearwall-expansion cavity; Flame stabilization; Cavity configuration; Equivalence ratio; OpenFOAM

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91541101, 11522222]
  2. National University of Defense Technology, China [B150102]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Large Eddy Simulation (LES) was employed to study the flame stabilization process in a hydrogen fueled scramjet combustor with a rearwall-expansion cavity. The numerical solver was first validated for a reactive flow, the scramjet combustor with rearwall-expansion cavity case, and the numerical results were shown in good agreement with the available experimental data. Effects of different cavity configurations and equivalence ratios on the flame stabilization process were then studied. It was found that during the combustion process, the most concentrated heat release regions are all located near the cavity rear wall. Besides, the majority of heat release regions are existed in the supersonic zones and attached to the sonic lines. The flame distribution in the combustor is sensitive to the equivalence ratio, and a thin flame would be formed when further decreasing the equivalence ratio. At the same equivalence ratio, the cavity with lower rear wall will delay the occurrence of chemical reaction and form a more concentrated and intense heat release region downstream the cavity, which will accelerate the chemical reaction and also achieve a sufficient combustion in the combustor. For the rearwall-expansion cavity, both the cavity configuration and equivalence ratio should be combined to optimize the flame stabilization process in the combustor. (C) 2016 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据