4.5 Article

Understanding the Origin of the Hysteresis of High-Performance Solution Processed Polycrystalline SnO2 Thin-Film Transistors and Applications to Circuits

期刊

MEMBRANES
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/membranes12010007

关键词

polycrystalline oxide semiconductor; tin oxide; thin film transistor; hysteresis; gate bias stress; high k; high bandgap; reliability; device application

资金

  1. Technology Innovation Program (or Industrial Development Strategic Technology Development Program) [20010082]
  2. Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE, Korea)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the origin of hysteresis in solution-processed polycrystalline SnO2 TFTs. By varying the curing temperature and conducting stress tests, it was found that holes trapped in the dielectric are the main source of hysteresis, leading to the fabrication of inverters and ring oscillators with minimal hysteresis.
Crystalline tin oxide has been investigated for industrial applications since the 1970s. Recently, the amorphous phase of tin oxide has been used in thin film transistors (TFTs) and has demonstrated high performance. For large area electronics, TFTs are well suited, but they are subject to various instabilities due to operating conditions, such as positive or negative bias stress PBS (NBS). Another instability is hysteresis, which can be detrimental in operating circuits. Understanding its origin can help fabricating more reliable TFTs. Here, we report an investigation on the origin of the hysteresis of solution-processed polycrystalline SnO2 TFTs. We examined the effect of the carrier concentration in the SnO2 channel region on the hysteresis by varying the curing temperature of the thin film from 200 to 350 degrees C. Stressing the TFTs characterized further the origin of the hysteresis, and holes trapped in the dielectric are understood to be the main source of the hysteresis. With TFTs showing the smallest hysteresis, we could fabricate inverters and ring oscillators.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据